Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

08:27
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Service intensity and organizational attributes: a preliminary inquiry
1School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, 969 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Administration and Policy in Mental Health
|October 27, 2001
Summary
Organizational factors significantly influence psychosocial intervention intensity. Understanding these elements is key for improving treatment outcomes for clients with substance abuse and homelessness.
Area of Science:
- Psychosocial intervention research
- Organizational psychology
- Substance abuse treatment
Background:
- Service intensity varies greatly among clients in psychosocial interventions.
- Previous studies on intensity determinants and impacts are limited and potentially biased.
- Reciprocal relationships between client behavior and service intensity are often unaccounted for.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore organizational attributes as key determinants of service intensity in psychosocial interventions.
- To address limitations in existing research on service intensity.
- To provide a framework for understanding and manipulating the organizational context of treatment.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from a psychosocial intervention for adults with homelessness and substance abuse issues (n=136).
- Examination of organizational attributes such as program life-cycles, learning routines, administrative reforms, worker attention spans, worker dispositions, and caseloads.
- Investigating the relationship between these organizational factors and service intensity.
Main Results:
- Organizational attributes provide a more comprehensive explanation for variations in service intensity.
- Factors like program life-cycles, administrative reforms, and caseloads were found to be significant.
- The study supports the argument that organizational context is a crucial, yet often overlooked, factor.
Conclusions:
- Intervention leaders need to recognize and actively manage the organizational context to optimize service delivery.
- Understanding organizational dynamics can lead to more effective and equitable psychosocial interventions.
- Further research should focus on the interplay between organizational factors and intervention outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Intelligence
The term "intelligence" is complex because it refers to both behavior and individuals, and its interpretation varies across cultures. European Americans tend to link intelligence with reasoning and cognitive skills, while in Kenya, it is tied to responsible participation in family and social life. In Uganda, intelligence is seen as the ability to know the right actions and carry them out effectively, while the Iatmul people of Papua New Guinea associate it with the capacity to remember detailed...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Implicit Personality Theories
Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
Trait Centrality
Trait centrality refers to the degree to which a particular characteristic influences the overall impression of an individual. Some traits exert a disproportionately strong impact on perception, shaping how people interpret other attributes of a person. Solomon Asch first systematically studied this phenomenon in 1946.Asch’s Experiment on Trait CentralityAsch's seminal study demonstrated the centrality of certain traits through a controlled experiment. Participants were presented with a list of...
