Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fictitious Academic Expertise and Processing Resources.

Patrick Chambres1, Rémy Versace, Catherine Auxiette

  • 1Université Blaise PASCAL, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Contemporary Educational Psychology
|October 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are there unconscious visual images in aphantasia? Development of an implicit priming paradigm.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Memory as a scale of simulation depending on the trace distinctiveness.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same author

Temporal Predictions in Space: Isochronous Rhythms Promote Forward Projections of the Body.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

Playing "guess who?": when an episodic specificity induction increases trace distinctiveness and reduces memory errors during event reconstruction.

Memory (Hove, England)·2021
Same author

Validation of New Methods of Using Simulated Whole-Body Movements as Implicit Indicators of Sound and Odor Preferences.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Spatial sonification of letters on tablets to stimulate literacy skills and handwriting in 5 y-o children: A pilot study.

Human movement science·2021
Same journal

Should I stay or should I go? Children's motivation in response to feedback and its association with math anxiety and math self-concept.

Contemporary educational psychology·2025
Same journal

The Joint Operations of Teacher-Student and Peer Relationships on Classroom Engagement among Low-Achieving Elementary Students: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study.

Contemporary educational psychology·2024
Same journal

Feelings on feedback: Children's emotional responses during mathematics problem solving.

Contemporary educational psychology·2023
Same journal

Parent-child conflict during homeschooling in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: A key role for mothers' self-efficacy in teaching.

Contemporary educational psychology·2022
Same journal

The 'Fauci Effect': Reducing COVID-19 misconceptions and vaccine hesitancy using an authentic multimodal intervention.

Contemporary educational psychology·2022
Same journal

The Role of Stereotype Threat in Ethnically Minoritized Students' Science Motivation: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study of Achievement and Persistence in STEM.

Contemporary educational psychology·2022
See all related articles

Assigning students a fictitious expert role boosts second language performance by influencing attentional capacity. This effect varies based on students' prior academic standing, impacting language learning strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Second Language Acquisition
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Previous research indicates fictitious expert roles enhance second language (L2) production.
  • The impact of assigned expertise is moderated by an individual's baseline expertise level.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if processing capacity mediates the fictitious expertise effect in L2 interaction.
  • To explore the role of attentional resources in performance variations linked to assigned expertise.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments employed a dual-task paradigm to assess attentional capacity.
  • Participants were assigned fictitious expert or nonexpert roles in specific competence dimensions.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Expertise assignments influenced reaction times on a secondary task, indicating differential attentional load.
  • The effect of assigned expertise was contingent upon students' usual academic standing.

Conclusions:

  • Performance variations in L2 interaction, related to assigned expertise, are partly explained by allocated processing resources.
  • Findings suggest that attentional capacity and prior academic achievement are key factors in the fictitious expertise effect.