Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Action does not resist visual illusions.

Volker H. Franz1

  • 1Max Planck Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstr. 38, D-72076,., Tübingen, Germany

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|October 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Action does not resist visual illusions, challenging the current action vs. perception hypothesis. Motor system effects are comparable to perceptual system effects, suggesting a unified processing system.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • The action vs. perception hypothesis posits distinct processing for visually guided actions and perception.
  • Recent studies debate whether the action system is immune to visual illusions.
  • Existing interpretations attempt to reconcile empirical findings with the hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the prevailing notion that the action system resists visual illusions.
  • To investigate the impact of visual illusions on both perception and motor systems.
  • To re-evaluate the current formulation of the action vs. perception hypothesis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of psychophysical evidence concerning visual illusions and grasping.
  • Analysis of studies investigating the effects of visual illusions on motor actions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of effects on perceptual and motor systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Empirical evidence suggests that action systems are affected by visual illusions.
    • The magnitude of illusion effects on the motor system is comparable to those on the perceptual system.
    • The findings contradict the idea that action is immune to visual illusions.

    Conclusions:

    • The action vs. perception hypothesis, in its current form, is challenged by the data.
    • Visual illusions impact both perception and action systems similarly.
    • A unified framework may better explain the interplay between perception and action.