Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peripheral constraint versus on-line programming in rapid aimed sequential movements.

A L Smiley-Oyen1, C J Worringham

  • 1Department of Health and Human Performance, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA. asmiley@iastate.edu

Acta Psychologica
|November 6, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age- and speed-related differences in harmonic ratios during walking.

Gait & posture·2011
Same author

Predictors of future falls in Parkinson disease.

Neurology·2010
Same author

Planning and control of sequential rapid aiming in adults with Parkinson's disease.

Journal of motor behavior·2007
Same author

Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease.

Experimental brain research·2005
Same author

Motor learning processes in a movement-scaling task in olivopontocerebellar atrophy and Parkinson's disease.

Experimental brain research·2003
Same author

Proprioception and stimulus-response compatibility.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2000
Same journal

Exploring the interactions between external support, internal psychological factors, and digital teaching competence: Evidence from a PLS-SEM model in Chinese rural teachers.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneity in moderation effects: How willingness-to-pay shapes the knowledge-behavior relationship in sustainable fashion consumption.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Impact of early environmental unpredictability on impulsive consumption: Insights from life history theory.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Pre-service foreign language teachers' acceptance of ChatGPT in microteaching lesson planning: A sequential mixed-methods study.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

AI-driven adaptive feedback and EFL writing performance: The roles of engagement, metacognition, and epistemic agency in a cross-linguistic context.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Crawling into a hole: Attachment insecurity, shame, and hikikomori symptoms in an adolescent population.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

This study shows that rapid aiming sequence control depends on target complexity. Preprogramming works for simpler sequences, but complex ones involve continuous on-line adjustments without added time cost.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding rapid aiming sequences is crucial for motor control research.
  • Previous models suggested preprogramming or peripheral constraints govern movement control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how programming and control of rapid aiming sequences change with complexity.
  • To determine if preprogramming/peripheral constraint models adequately explain control of complex sequences.
  • To identify when on-line programming occurs during rapid aiming.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments manipulated sequence complexity by varying the number of targets (1-11).
  • Measured initiation/execution timing, probe reaction time (RT), and movement kinematics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed performance in blocked (consistent length) and random (variable length) execution fashions.

    • Main Results:

    • Preprogramming/peripheral constraint model supported for up to 7 targets in blocked sequences.
    • In random sequences, preprogramming did not increase with complexity; on-line programming occurred without time cost.
    • Later targets constrained earlier movements, and programming was influenced by spatial trajectory (subtended angle) and average velocity.

    Conclusions:

    • A continuous processing model, where programming and execution co-occur, best explains rapid aiming.
    • On-line programming can occur without a time penalty, especially in complex or random sequences.
    • Average velocity decreases with target number, controlling movement segment variability.