Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Equipoise and international human-subjects research.

A J London1

  • 1Department of Philosophy & Center for the Advancement of Applied Ethics, Carnegie Mellon University, 135 Baker Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. ajlondon@andrew.cmu.edu

Bioethics
|November 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study explores equipoise in international research, presenting two distinct interpretations. A broader similarity criterion better prevents exploitation and aligns ethical research with developing world needs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Direct observation of individual hydrogen atoms at trapping sites in a ferritic steel.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2017
Same author

Quantification of oxide particle composition in model oxide dispersion strengthened steel alloys.

Ultramicroscopy·2015
Same author

Ethical issues in haemophilia.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2006
Same author

Amenable to reason: Aristotle's rhetoric and the moral psychology of practical ethics.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2001
Same author

The Maltese conjoined twins. Two views of their separation.

The Hastings Center report·2001
Same author

The Maltese conjoined twins. A separate peace.

The Hastings Center report·2001

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Global Health Research
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • International research requires careful ethical evaluation.
  • The principle of equipoise is central to assessing research validity and ethics.
  • Existing interpretations of equipoise face challenges in global contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the role of equipoise in evaluating international research proposals.
  • To distinguish between two formulations of the equipoise requirement.
  • To propose an interpretation of equipoise that addresses ethical concerns in global health research.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the concept of equipoise in the context of international research.
  • Distinction between narrow and broad criteria for similarity in clinical contexts.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical evaluation of research proposals based on differing equipoise interpretations.

    • Main Results:

    • Two formulations of equipoise lead to divergent evaluations of international research.
    • A narrow criterion of similarity presents significant ethical and practical problems.
    • A broader criterion of similarity better mitigates exploitation of vulnerable populations.

    Conclusions:

    • A broader interpretation of equipoise is ethically superior for international research.
    • This approach helps avoid exploitation and promotes equitable research practices.
    • It reconciles the need for context-specific interventions with essential moral constraints.