Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Information transfer between rhythmically coupled networks: reading the hippocampal phase code.

O Jensen1

  • 1Brain Research Unit, Low Temperature Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, FIN-02015 Espoo, Finland. ojensen@neuro.hut.fi

Neural Computation
|November 14, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Drones can reliably, accurately and with high levels of precision, collect large volume water samples and physio-chemical data from lakes.

The Science of the total environment·2022
Same author

Probing cortical excitability using rapid frequency tagging.

NeuroImage·2019
Same author

Dispersion of <i>Echinococcus granulosus</i> eggs from infected dogs under natural conditions in Patagonia, Argentina.

Journal of helminthology·2019
Same author

Diminished modulation of preparatory sensorimotor mu rhythm predicts attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder severity.

Psychological medicine·2017
Same author

Decoding of task-relevant and task-irrelevant intracranial EEG representations.

NeuroImage·2016
Same author

Serology and longevity of immunity against Echinococcus granulosus in sheep and llama induced by an oil-based EG95 vaccine.

Parasite immunology·2016
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a computational model for brain network communication using theta rhythm phase coding. The model decodes hippocampal place cell activity, distinguishing current from upcoming spatial information based on theta phase input.

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Systems neuroscience
  • Neural oscillations

Background:

  • Rhythmic coupling between brain networks is widely reported and hypothesized to facilitate information exchange.
  • Few computational models exist to explain the benefits of this rhythmic coupling.
  • Hippocampal place cells in rats use phase coding, where firing phase relative to the theta rhythm encodes spatial information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a physiologically plausible computational mechanism for decoding hippocampal output based on phase coding.
  • To demonstrate how an oscillatory network can interpret phase-coded information.
  • To explore the role of theta rhythm phase in information transfer between neural networks.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a simple, physiologically plausible oscillatory network model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulation of the network's ability to decode hippocampal place cell firing patterns.
  • Manipulation of the theta rhythm input phase to the decoder network.
  • Main Results:

    • The proposed oscillatory network successfully decodes hippocampal output.
    • Changing the phase of the theta input to the decoder alters the information read.
    • Specific theta phases allow the decoder to differentiate between current and upcoming spatial representations.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed mechanism offers a computational principle for information transfer between oscillatory neural networks.
    • Theta phase coding provides a flexible mechanism for encoding and decoding dynamic spatial information.
    • This principle may be applicable to information processing in other brain regions beyond the hippocampus.