Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Macaque thresholds for detecting increases in intensity: effects of formant structure
C G Le Prell1, A J Niemiec, D B Moody
1Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0506, USA. colleng@umich.edu
Abstract:
Macaque monkeys, like humans, are more sensitive to differences in formant frequency than to differences in the frequency of pure tones (see Sinnott et al. (1987) J. Comp. Psychol. 94, 401-415; Pfingst (1993) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2124-2129; Prosen et al. (1990) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 2152-2158; Sinnott et al. (1985) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1977-1985; Sinnott and Kreiter (1991) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2421-2429; for summary, see May et al. (1996) Aud. Neurosci. 3, 135-162). In the discrimination of formant frequency, it appears that the relevant cue for macaque monkeys is relative level differences of the component frequencies (Sommers et al. (1992) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3499-3510). To further explore the result of Sommers et al., we trained macaque monkeys (Macaca fuscata) to report detection of a change in the spectral shape of multi-component harmonic complexes. Spectral shape changes were produced by the addition of intensity increments. When the amplitude spectrum of the comparison stimulus was modeled after the /ae/ vowel sound, thresholds for detecting a change from the comparison stimulus were lowest when intensity increments were added at spectral peaks. These results parallel previous data from human subjects, suggesting that both human and monkey subjects may process vowel spectra through simultaneous comparisons of component levels across the spectrum. When the subjects were asked to detect a change from a comparison stimulus with a flat amplitude spectrum, the subjects showed sensitivity that was relatively comparable to that of human subjects tested in other investigations (e.g. Zera et al. (1993) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 3431-3441). In additional experiments, neither increasing the dynamic range of the /ae/ spectrum nor dynamically varying the amplitude of the increment during the stimulus presentation reliably affected detection thresholds.
Related Concept Videos
Sound Intensity
Sound Intensity Level
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and hence a...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Intensity and Pressure of Sound Waves
Unlike the time average of a sinusoidal term, which is zero since it is positive and...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

