Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal Response to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects.

P R Martens1, J K Russell, B Wolcke

  • 1Emergency Medicine Department, St. Jan Hospital, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium. patrick.martens@azbrugge.be

Resuscitation
|November 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Offset integrity reduces environmental risk: Using lessons from biodiversity and carbon offsetting to inform water quality offsetting in the catchments of the Great Barrier Reef.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Excitonic Insulators and Superfluidity in Two-Dimensional Bilayers without External Fields.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2023
Same author

[Ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions].

Notfall & rettungsmedizin·2020
Same author

European Resuscitation Council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary.

Resuscitation·2020
Same author

Space partitioning of exchange-correlation functionals with the projector augmented-wave method.

The Journal of chemical physics·2019
Same author

When is a bystander not a bystander any more? A European survey.

Resuscitation·2018
Same journal

Device damage and malfunction during dual defibrillation or dual electrical cardioversion: a scoping review.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Pre-hospital neurological risk stratification at return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - the Pre-MIRACLE<sub>2</sub> score.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Beyond Creatinine: Kidney Biomarkers as Windows into Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury After Cardiac Arrest.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Optimal Site of Tactile Stimulation during Initial Steps of Neonatal Resuscitation: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Resolving uncertainties in patient selection for mechanical circulatory support after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Resuscitation·2026
Same journal

Association of Rescue Breathing With Outcomes in Adult Suffocation-Related Cardiac Arrest.

Resuscitation·2026
See all related articles

The innovative impedance-compensated biphasic truncated exponential (ICBTE) waveform demonstrated superior defibrillation efficacy and speed compared to standard monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) and monophasic damped sine (MDS) waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Early defibrillation is crucial for cardiac arrest survival.
  • Innovations in defibrillation waveforms impact device size and weight, influencing accessibility.
  • This study compares a novel biphasic waveform AED with standard monophasic waveform AEDs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the defibrillation efficacy and speed of impedance-compensated biphasic truncated exponential (ICBTE) AEDs against monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) and monophasic damped sine (MDS) AEDs.
  • To evaluate secondary endpoints including return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), refibrillation, and survival rates.
  • To distinguish performance differences between MTE and MDS monophasic waveforms.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized trial in four emergency medical services.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of ICBTE waveform AEDs versus MTE and MDS waveform AEDs.
  • Primary endpoint: defibrillation efficacy with ≤3 shocks; Secondary endpoints: shock efficacy, ROSC, refibrillation, survival to admission/discharge.

    • Main Results:

    • ICBTE waveform showed superior defibrillation efficacy (≤3, ≤2, and single shock) compared to MTE and MDS.
    • Time to first and successful shock was significantly faster with ICBTE devices.
    • Higher rates of pre-hospital ROSC were observed with ICBTE compared to MTE, with no significant difference between ICBTE and MDS.

    Conclusions:

    • ICBTE waveform is superior to MTE and MDS in defibrillation efficacy and speed.
    • ICBTE demonstrated improved ROSC rates compared to MTE.
    • No significant differences were found in refibrillation or survival rates among the different waveforms.