Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Evaluating the effect of a regional training initiative on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates after
Jake Toy1, Juliana Tolles2, David G Dillon3
1Los Angeles Emergency Medical Services Agency, 10100 Pioneer Blvd, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670, USA; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 1000 W Carson St., Torrance, CA 90502, USA; The Lundquist Institute, For Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson St., Torrance, CA 90502, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 855 Tiverton Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Background:
We evaluated the impact of a regional, year-long bystander hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education and training initiative conducted at the community level on bystander CPR rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Methods:
We used a difference-in-differences framework to estimate the association between the intervention and bystander CPR rates in a single large county compared with two other counties as controls. We used data from January 2022 to December 2024 from Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). We excluded OHCA events at health care facilities. Our primary outcome was the change in bystander CPR rates associated with the intervention; this analysis was stratified by home and public locations. Additionally, we evaluated the secondary outcomes of survival to hospital discharge and neurologically intact survival. We fit logistic regression models for each of these outcomes with fixed effects for each county.
Results:
Of 20,414 included patients; 15,417 were from the intervention region. Overall, bystander CPR rates increased from 37.4% to 42.5% in the intervention region between the pre- and post-intervention periods; however, our adjusted model did not identify a significant intervention effect (2.94 percentage-points; 95% CI -0.95 to 6.83). In public locations, our adjusted model identified a significant 8.59 percentage-point increase in bystander CPR rates associated with the intervention (95% CI 0.22-16.96), and no significant effect in home locations. We did not find a significant intervention effect on survival to hospital discharge and neurologically intact survival between the pre- and post-intervention periods.
Conclusions:
While we observed an increasing trend in bystander CPR rates in all regions, this change was not associated with the intervention. However, we found that the intervention was associated with a significant increase in bystander CPR rates for public OHCAs.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

