Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

An In Vitro Skin Irritation Test (SIT) using the EpiDerm Reconstructed Human Epidermal (RHE) Model
Published on: July 13, 2009
Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?
Abstract:
For testing with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and cutaneous blood flow with laser Doppler (LD) are considered to be the most reliable methods. The aim of this study was to determine which method of measurement should be preferred when conducting SLS testing under varying conditions. Patch testing with SLS at different concentrations and exposure times was performed. TEWL values were compared with those of LD. TEWL values showed distinct changes at low SLS concentrations and short application periods. By contrast, higher SLS concentrations were necessary to increase LD values. Short application of patches changed TEWL rather than LD values. When evaluating SLS patch testing by bioengineering methods, TEWL measurement appears to be more suitable for a test procedure that provokes mild skin reactions (SLS concentration <1%), whereas LD measurement is more appropriate to evaluate pronounced skin reactions (SLS concentration >or=1%).
More Related Videos
10:13Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for Hazard Identification of Eye Irritating Chemicals using Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelial (RhCE) Tissue Model
Published on: August 23, 2015
07:45Simple Polyacrylamide-based Multiwell Stiffness Assay for the Study of Stiffness-dependent Cell Responses
Published on: March 25, 2015