Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment.

S Greenland1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, UCLA College of Letters and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|December 1, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Standard statistical methods underestimate uncertainty in observational data. Sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo risk analysis (MCRA) require prior specification similar to Bayesian methods for accurate uncertainty assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glaucoma outcome studies using existing databases: opportunities and limitations.

Journal of glaucoma·2009
Same author

Small-sample bias and corrections for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects.

International journal of epidemiology·2002
Same author

Putting background information about relative risks into conjugate prior distributions.

Biometrics·2001
Same author

Data augmentation priors for Bayesian and semi-Bayes analyses of conditional-logistic and proportional-hazards regression.

Statistics in medicine·2001

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Observational data analysis often understates uncertainty in effect estimates.
  • Existing methods like sensitivity analysis and MCRA have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the uncertainty assessment in observational data analysis.
  • To compare MCRA and sensitivity analysis with Bayesian methods.

Main Methods:

  • Review of standard statistical methods for uncertainty.
  • Application and comparison of sensitivity analysis, MCRA, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment.

Main Results:

  • MCRA estimates are not inherently frequentist or Bayesian.
  • Sensitivity analyses and MCRA require rigorous prior specification.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Both sensitivity analysis and MCRA should adopt Bayesian-style prior specification.
  • Improved methods are needed for robust uncertainty quantification in observational studies.