Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

16:49
Multifocal Electroretinograms
Published on: December 4, 2011
Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs
1Department of Ophthalmology, Niigata University School of Medicine, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, Japan. hasesig2@med.niigata-u.ac.jp
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|December 1, 2001
Summary
Multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials (MVEPs) can sensitively detect early glaucoma by measuring contrast sensitivity function (CSF). This method offers a more sensitive approach than traditional perimetry for identifying subtle optic nerve damage.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Electrophysiology
Background:
- Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness characterized by progressive optic nerve damage.
- Early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects is crucial for timely intervention and vision preservation.
- Traditional perimetry may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle visual field abnormalities in early glaucoma.
Purpose of the Study:
- To objectively measure visual field function using contrast sensitivity function (CSF).
- To sensitively detect early glaucomatous visual field defects.
- To evaluate the efficacy of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials (MVEPs) in assessing CSF for glaucoma detection.
Main Methods:
- Multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials (MVEPs) were recorded from normal subjects and patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
- A multi-input procedure generated 37 local VEP responses to scaled hexagonal patterns reversing in counterphase.
- Contrast thresholds were measured at 32% and 8% pattern contrasts, with MVEPs averaged to enhance signal-to-noise ratio.
Main Results:
- In normal subjects, MVEP amplitudes decreased with eccentricity and contrast, with lower amplitudes in the upper visual field.
- Contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) estimated by MVEPs remained relatively constant across retinal eccentricity.
- Glaucoma patients exhibited significantly smaller CSFs compared to normal controls, even in areas with mild visual field loss (P < 0.001).
- CSF measurements showed a significant correlation with perimetric sensitivity (r = 0.57, P < 0.001).
- CSF mapping demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting early glaucomatous optic nerve damage compared to standard perimetry.
Conclusions:
- Measuring contrast sensitivity using MVEPs is a sensitive method for detecting local optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.
- MVEP-derived CSF assessment offers a valuable tool for early diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma.
- This electrophysiological approach complements traditional perimetry in the comprehensive evaluation of glaucoma.

