Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

W-plasty and geometric broken line closure.

B J Rodgers1, E F Williams, C R Hove

  • 1Rodgers Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Boise, ID, USA.

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|December 6, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Scar revision techniques like W-plasty and geometric broken line closure improve appearance by irregularizing scars. These methods offer benefits for scars over 2 cm or 2 mm, balancing risks and rewards.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The treatment of vascular malformations: port-wine stains.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2007
Same author

Management of cutaneous hemangiomas.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2007
Same author

Z-plasty: a concise review.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2001
Same author

Giant cell angiofibroma of the nasolacrimal duct.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Histological study of injected autologous fascia in the paralyzed canine vocal fold.

The Laryngoscope·2000
Same author

Hemangiomas in infants and children. An algorithm for intervention.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2000

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Dermatology
  • Wound Healing

Background:

  • Scar revision decisions involve risk-benefit analysis.
  • Scars exceeding 2 cm in length or 2 mm in width are candidates for improvement.
  • Scar irregularization is a long-standing technique for camouflage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss scar irregularization techniques for camouflage.
  • To compare W-plasty and geometric broken line closure for scar revision.
  • To analyze the advantages, disadvantages, and design principles of each method.

Main Methods:

  • Review of scar irregularization techniques.
  • Focus on W-plasty for regularly irregular scars.
  • Focus on geometric broken line closure for irregularly irregular scars.

Main Results:

  • Both W-plasty and geometric broken line closure can yield excellent results.
  • Technique effectiveness depends on correct application and appropriate patient selection.
  • Detailed discussion of the pros, cons, and design considerations for each method.

Conclusions:

  • Scar irregularization, via W-plasty or geometric broken line closure, is effective for scar camouflage.
  • Appropriate technique selection is crucial for optimal scar revision outcomes.
  • Risk-benefit assessment guides the decision for scar revision.

Related Experiment Videos