Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

19:53
Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer
Published on: March 1, 2015
National plastic surgery survey: brow lifting techniques and complications
A Elkwood1, A Matarasso, M Rankin
1Plastic Surgery Center, Shrewsbury, NJ 07702, USA. AElkwood@aol.com
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|December 18, 2001
Summary
This survey on brow lifting techniques found both endoscopic and coronal methods effective. Surgeons favored the coronal approach for better results in brow elevation and wrinkle reduction, with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Otolaryngology
- Dermatology
Background:
- Brow lifting is a common cosmetic procedure.
- Understanding current trends in brow lifting techniques and outcomes is essential for plastic surgeons.
- Previous research has focused on facelift complications, with brow lift data pending.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess current trends in brow lifting philosophy, surgical techniques, and associated complications.
- To compare the effectiveness and complication rates of endoscopic versus coronal brow lift procedures.
- To gather data on patient satisfaction following brow lift surgery.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to 3800 members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
- The survey response rate was 15%, yielding data on 6951 brow lift procedures.
- Data collected included surgical technique (endoscopic or coronal) and reported outcomes.
Main Results:
- Both endoscopic and coronal brow lift techniques were reported as effective by surgeons.
- The coronal brow lift technique was considered more effective for brow elevation, transverse line reduction, and glabellar line reduction.
- Complication rates were low for both methods, with alopecia being the most frequent (2.9%-4%).
- Patient satisfaction was high, ranging from 98.2% to 99.2%.
Conclusions:
- Both endoscopic and coronal brow lifts are effective procedures with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction.
- The coronal approach may offer superior results for specific aesthetic goals compared to the endoscopic technique.
- Alopecia is the most common complication, but overall complication and major complication rates are low.

