Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dimensional change in motor learning.

K M Newell1, D E Vaillancourt

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 146 Recreation Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA. kmn1@psu.edu

Human Movement Science
|December 26, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Altered Functional Brain Connectivity in Dyt1 Knock-in mouse models.

Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Cell-specific Dyt1 ∆GAG knock-in to basal ganglia and cerebellum reveal differential effects on motor behavior and sensorimotor network function.

Experimental neurology·2023
Same author

Cell-specific effects of Dyt1 knock-out on sensory processing, network-level connectivity, and motor deficits.

Experimental neurology·2021
Same author

Effects of ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation across multiple effectors in essential tremor.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2019
Same author

Task experience influences coordinative structures and performance variables in learning a slalom ski-simulator task.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2018
Same author

The pattern of coupling dynamics between postural motion, isotonic hand movements and physiological tremor.

Neuroscience letters·2014
Same journal

Dissociating variability from error-based processes in observational learning.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Associations between movement behaviors, sleep, and screen time exposure in middle childhood using multivariable modelling.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

The interaction of biomechanical demands and the speed-accuracy trade-off for the control of multi-directional, three-dimensional targeted reaching movements.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Think positive, perform better: The detrimental effect of technical motor imagery before action.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Shoulder-elbow coordination in the transverse plane during badminton forehand drive depending on training status using vector coding analysis.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Delayed reaction time and altered spatial activation of Fibularis longus in chronic ankle instability: A high-density surface electromyography study.

Human movement science·2026
See all related articles

Motor learning involves changes in movement control. This study shows that the organization of mechanical degrees of freedom can increase or decrease based on task demands, challenging previous stage-based theories.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control
  • Biomechanics
  • Motor Learning

Background:

  • Bernstein's theory proposed a 3-stage model for reorganizing peripheral biomechanical degrees of freedom during motor learning.
  • This framework is considered too narrow in explaining the dynamic pathways of change in motor control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge Bernstein's narrow view of the degrees of freedom problem in motor learning.
  • To explore how changes in mechanical degrees of freedom and attractor dynamics are influenced by task constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of motor control and learning.
  • Examination of the relationship between task constraints and the dimensionality of motor output.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The organization of mechanical degrees of freedom and the dimension of attractor dynamics can increase or decrease.
  • Directional change in dimensionality depends on whether task-relevant dynamics need to be increased or decreased.

    • Conclusions:

    • Motor learning involves flexible changes in degrees of freedom organization, not strictly stage-based.
    • Task constraints are central in determining the direction of change in motor control dimensionality.