Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Increasing Pulmonary Artery Pulsatile Flow Improves Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension in Piglets
Published on: May 11, 2015
Pressure amplification explains why pulse pressure is unrelated to risk in young subjects
I B Wilkinson1, S S Franklin, I R Hall
1Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom. ibw20@cam.ac.uk
Insights
Pulse pressure is a better predictor of heart disease in older adults, while diastolic pressure is better for younger individuals. This age-related difference in blood pressure amplification explains this disparity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Gerontology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Diastolic blood pressure is a better predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in younger subjects, whereas pulse pressure is more predictive in older subjects.
- This age-related disparity in CHD risk prediction is not fully understood.
- Age-related changes in arterial hemodynamics, specifically pressure amplification, may play a role.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the hypothesis that age-related differences in pressure amplification contribute to the varying predictive value of pulse and diastolic pressures for CHD risk.
- To examine the relationship between age, pressure amplification, and diastolic pressure in younger and older subjects.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of data from 432 subjects (212 < 50 years, 230 >= 50 years) free from cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and medication.
- Peripheral blood pressure measured by sphygmomanometry.
- Central blood pressure derived from noninvasive radial artery waveforms using applanation tonometry.
- Pressure amplification calculated as the ratio of peripheral to central pulse pressure.
Main Results:
- Pressure amplification significantly decreased with age (r=0.7; P<0.001).
- An inverse relationship was observed between pressure amplification and diastolic pressure in younger subjects (r=0.3; P<0.001), but not in older subjects (P=0.2).
- Reduced amplification in older subjects is attributed to enhanced wave reflection, and its decline with rising diastolic pressure in younger individuals explains why peripheral pulse pressure underestimates diastolic pressure's central effect.
Conclusions:
- Age-related differences in pressure amplification, influenced by wave reflection, explain the varying predictive power of pulse and diastolic pressures for CHD risk.
- Peripheral pulse pressure may underestimate the impact of diastolic pressure on central pressure in younger individuals.
- Assessing central blood pressure may enhance cardiovascular risk stratification across different age groups.
Abstract:
Pulse pressure rather than diastolic pressure is the best predictor of coronary heart disease risk in older subjects, but the converse is true in younger subjects. We hypothesized that this disparity results from an age-related difference in pressure amplification from the aorta to brachial artery. Data from 212 subjects age < 50 years and 230 subjects age > or =50 years were abstracted from a community database. All subjects were free from cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and medication. Peripheral blood pressure was assessed by sphygmomanometry. Radial artery waveforms recorded noninvasively by applanation tonometry were used to derive central blood pressure. Pressure amplification (peripheral/central pulse pressure ratio) was linearly related to age (r=0.7; P<0.001). There was an inverse, linear relationship between amplification and diastolic pressure in the younger group (r=0.3; P<0.001) but not in older subjects (r=0.1; P=0.2). There was no relationship in either group when the amplification ratio was calculated with nonaugmented central pressure. Amplification is reduced in older subjects because of enhanced wave reflection. In younger, but not older, subjects, amplification declines as diastolic pressure rises. Therefore, peripheral pulse pressure underestimates the effect that diastolic pressure has on central pulse pressure in younger subjects. This may explain why diastolic pressure is a better predictor of risk in this age group and suggests that assessment of central pressure may improve risk stratification further.
More Related Videos
05:51Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
06:04Pulse-Wave Velocity, Flow-Mediated Dilation, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness to Assess Cardiovascular Risk in Population with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pulse
Pulse Rate and its Significance
Pulse rate, often measured in beats per minute (bpm), reflects the heart rate (HR), which is influenced by numerous factors such as stress, physical activity, and hormonal changes. A normal resting adult pulse rate falls between...
Blood Pressure
The average BP in an adult is typically around 120/80 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). In this measurement, the numerator (120) indicates the systolic pressure, which is the pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart's ventricles as blood is expelled. The denominator (80) represents the diastolic...
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical indicator...