Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques.

C P Turssi1, J R Saad, S L Duarte

  • 1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil. cturssi@yahoo.com

American Journal of Dentistry
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary

The smoothest resin-based composite surfaces were achieved using Sof-Lex disks followed by Prisma Gloss polishing. Enhance points alone resulted in the roughest surfaces, highlighting technique importance for dental restorations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coating Agents for Resin Composites: Effect on Color Stability, Roughness, and Surface Micromorphology Subjected to Brushing Wear.

Operative dentistry·2025
Same author

Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-fill Resin Composites Submitted to Additional Polymerization for Use in Semi-direct Restorations.

Operative dentistry·2024
Same author

Evaluation of Bond Strength of Three Glass Fiber Post-systems Cemented to Large Root Canals.

Operative dentistry·2024
Same author

Influence of Application Modes on Increasing Bond Strength Longevity of Self-etching and Universal Adhesive Systems to Enamel.

Operative dentistry·2023
Same author

Effect of Commercial Mouth Rinses on Physical Properties of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin Composites.

Operative dentistry·2023
Same author

Flexural Strength of Conventional or Bulk-fill Resin Composite Repaired with High- or Low-viscosity Restorative Materials.

Operative dentistry·2023

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Surface Characterization

Background:

  • Surface roughness of resin-based composites (RBCs) significantly impacts their clinical performance and longevity.
  • Effective finishing and polishing are crucial for achieving smooth RBC surfaces, reducing plaque accumulation and wear.
  • Understanding the comparative efficacy of different finishing and polishing protocols is essential for restorative dentistry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the effects of four distinct finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of resin-based composites (RBCs).
  • To determine which technique yields the smoothest surface finish for RBCs.

Main Methods:

  • Forty specimens of each RBC material were prepared and their baseline surface roughness (Ra) measured using a profilometer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Specimens underwent one of four finishing and polishing protocols: Sof-Lex disks, Sof-Lex disks with Prisma Gloss, Enhance points, or Enhance points with Prisma Gloss.
  • Post-polishing surface roughness was measured, and the difference from baseline values was analyzed statistically.
  • Main Results:

    • Statistical analysis (ANOVA) revealed significant differences in surface roughness among the tested finishing and polishing techniques (P = 0.0157).
    • The combination of Sof-Lex disks followed by Prisma Gloss polishing paste produced the smoothest surface.
    • The Enhance points finishing system alone resulted in the roughest surface compared to other techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of finishing and polishing technique significantly influences the final surface roughness of resin-based composites.
    • A two-step approach using Sof-Lex disks followed by Prisma Gloss is recommended for achieving optimal surface smoothness in RBC restorations.
    • The Enhance points system, when used alone, is less effective in reducing surface roughness.