Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Matched case-control data analysis with selection bias.

I F Lin1, M C Paik

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.

Biometrics
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lower prevalence of silent brain infarcts in the physically active: the Northern Manhattan Study.

Neurology·2011
Same author

Quality of life declines after first ischemic stroke. The Northern Manhattan Study.

Neurology·2010
Same author

The Levels of Inflammatory Markers in the Treatment of Stroke study (LIMITS): inflammatory biomarkers as risk predictors after lacunar stroke.

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2010
Same author

Physical activity and risk of ischemic stroke in the Northern Manhattan Study.

Neurology·2009
Same author

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts mortality but not stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study.

Neurology·2009
Same author

Carotid plaque, a subclinical precursor of vascular events: the Northern Manhattan Study.

Neurology·2008
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Case-control studies can be efficient but suffer from selection bias. This study introduces new bias-corrected estimators to improve the reliability of case-control study findings.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Case-control studies are valuable for hypothesis testing but are susceptible to selection bias.
  • Selection bias in case-control studies can invalidate results and is difficult to assess.
  • Existing methods for evaluating and correcting selection bias are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel bias-corrected estimators for case-control studies.
  • To address the challenge of selection bias in epidemiological research.
  • To provide a statistically sound method for improving the accuracy of case-control inferences.

Main Methods:

  • Development of bias-corrected estimators using a joint estimating equation approach.
  • Application of the method to data from the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study (NOMASS).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing telephone survey data to inform selection probabilities and potential bias.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed joint estimating equation approach yields bias-corrected estimates.
    • Standard statistical software can be used to obtain the bias-corrected estimate and its standard error.
    • The methodology provides a practical tool for researchers dealing with selection bias.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed bias-corrected estimators enhance the validity of case-control studies.
    • This approach offers a feasible solution for mitigating selection bias in epidemiological research.
    • The method facilitates more reliable inferences from case-control study designs.