Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Multiple chemical sensitivity: discriminant validity of case definitions
G E McKeown-Eyssen1, C J Baines, L M Marshall
1Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
This study evaluated multiple chemical sensitivity definitions using the University of Toronto Health Survey. Two definitions, Nethercott et al. and the 1999 Consensus, showed strong discriminatory power for identifying patients with multiple chemical sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- Clinical Toxicology
Background:
- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a poorly understood condition characterized by adverse reactions to low-level chemical exposures.
- Accurate diagnostic criteria are essential for understanding MCS prevalence and patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the discriminant validity of seven existing case definitions for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS).
- To identify which definitions best differentiate individuals with MCS across various healthcare settings.
Main Methods:
- A total of 4,126 adults attending general, allergy, occupational, and environmental health practices completed the University of Toronto Health Survey questionnaire.
- Responses were matched against features from seven established MCS case definitions.
- Statistical analysis assessed the ability of each definition to identify patients within different practice types.
Main Results:
- The prevalence of reported symptoms varied significantly by practice type, being highest in environmental health practices.
- The Nethercott et al. and 1999 Consensus definitions demonstrated high accuracy (>80%) in identifying patients in environmental health practices.
- A combination of four specific symptoms (heightened sense of smell, dullness, spaciness, concentration difficulties) also showed successful discrimination.
Conclusions:
- Features from the Nethercott et al. and 1999 Consensus definitions exhibited good discriminant validity in the University of Toronto Health Survey.
- These definitions effectively identify patients with a higher likelihood of experiencing Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.
- Specific symptom clusters can aid in the diagnostic process for MCS.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Toxicity: Allergic Reactions
Toxidromes: Clinical Features
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

