Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How to assess spatial neglect--line bisection or cancellation tasks?

S Ferber1, H O Karnath

  • 1Department of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, Germany.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
|January 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Cancellation tests are more effective than line bisection for detecting spatial neglect. The line bisection test missed 40% of patients, while cancellation tasks like the bells test identified most cases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disconnection in a left-hemispheric temporo-parietal network impairs multiplication fact retrieval.

NeuroImage·2023
Same author

Pluripotent stem cells: induction and self-renewal.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2018
Same author

Innovative encapsulation platform based on pancreatic extracellular matrix achieve substantial insulin delivery.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2016
Same author

Final results from 18 years of the International Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry.

Neurology·2011
Same author

Eye movements tell only half the story.

Neurology·2003
Same author

Prognosis of contraversive pushing.

Journal of neurology·2002

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Spatial neglect is a common deficit following brain injury.
  • Cancellation tests and line bisection are standard assessment tools.
  • Recent findings question the diagnostic specificity of these tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of line bisection and cancellation tasks in detecting spatial neglect.
  • To evaluate the clinical utility of different spatial neglect assessment tools.

Main Methods:

  • Tested 35 patients with confirmed spatial neglect.
  • Administered a line bisection task and four distinct cancellation tasks.
  • Analyzed the sensitivity of each task in identifying neglect.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Line bisection missed 40% of spatial neglect cases.
  • Letter cancellation and bells tests each missed only 6% of cases.
  • Line bisection deviations can stem from other conditions (e.g., hemianopia).

Conclusions:

  • Cancellation tests (bells, letter cancellation) are superior for detecting spatial neglect.
  • Line bisection is less reliable and should be interpreted with caution.
  • Cancellation tasks offer a more robust diagnostic approach for spatial neglect.