Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

Standardized Protocol to Evaluate the Effect of Surface Treatments, Luting Cements, and Thermocycling on PEEK–Composite Bond Strength
Published on: June 9, 2026
Tensile bond strengths of fourth- and fifth-generation dentin adhesives with packable resin composites
S H Koh1, J M Powers, R D Bebermeyer
1The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Dental Branch, 77030-3402, USA. Sheila.H.Koh@uth.tmc.edu
Purpose:
Placement of packable composites would be simplified if a single-bottle dentin bonding agent, rather than the more complex, multiple-bottle dentin bonding agents, involving multiple steps, could be used successfully with adequate bond strength. This study was designed to compare the tensile bond strengths to extracted human dentin of four single-bottle (fifth-generation) and four multiple-bottle (fourth-generation) dentin bonding agents with four packable composites.
Materials And Methods:
Packable composites (P60, 3M Dental Products Division; ALERT, Jeneric-Pentron; Pyramid Dentin, Bisco; and Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray America) were tested for in vitro tensile bond strength to human dentin with their single-bottle and their multiple-bottle dentin bonding agents. Bond strengths were measured using a truncated cone tensile test, with a bonding diameter of 3 mm, after storage of specimens in water at 37 degrees C and 100% relative humidity for 24 hours, and using a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm per minute.
Results:
Means and standard deviations (n = 10) of tensile bond strengths (MPa) for the single-bottle system were P60, 21.3 MPa (6.7); ALERT, 26.6 MPa (4.2); Pyramid Dentin, 14.8 MPa (4.4); and Clearfil AP-X, 18.6 MPa (3.7). For the multiple-bottle system they were P60, 20.0 MPa (8.6); ALERT, 20.6 MPa (6.2); Pyramid Dentin, 16.0 MPa (3.4); and Clearfil AP-X, 17.8 MPa (6.0). Two-way analysis of variance showed significant differences among composites but no significant differences between single-bottle and multiple-bottle bonding agents. The Tukey-Kramer interval (p < .05) for comparisons of bond strengths among composites was 4.8 MPa.
Conclusions:
For single-bottle agents, bond strengths were ranked as ALERT > P60, P60 = Clearfil, P60 > Pyramid, and Clearfil = Pyramid. For multiple-bottle agents, there were no significant differences in bond strengths among the composites.
Clinical Significance:
Single-bottle bonding agents provide similar in vitro bond strengths for use with packable composites as do the same manufacturers' multiple-bottle bonding agents.
Related Concept Videos
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen also...
Mortar Properties
Chemical Bonds
Atoms participate in a chemical bond formation to acquire a completed valence-shell electron configuration similar to that of the noble gas nearest to it in atomic number. Ionic, covalent, and metallic bonds are some of the important types of chemical bonds. Bond energy and bond length determine the strength of a chemical bond.
Types of Chemical Bonds
An ionic bond is formed due to electrostatic attraction between cations and anions. Often, the ions are formed by the transfer of electrons from...
