Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Eric Sobel1, Jeanette C Papp, Kenneth Lange

  • 1Department of 1Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles 90095, USA. esobel@ucla.edu

American Journal of Human Genetics
|January 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Genotyping errors significantly impact genetic analysis. This study introduces new algorithms to accurately calculate pedigree likelihoods, incorporating error models for improved statistical genetics and applications like paternity testing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

mGEM: multigraph estimation models for pattern analysis.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same author

An approximate-copula distribution for statistical modeling.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Generalizations of the quadratic bound optimization principle.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Closest Farthest Widest.

Algorithms·2025
Same author

A Cornucopia of Maximum Likelihood Algorithms.

The American statistician·2025
Same author

Bootstrap estimation of the proportion of outliers in robust regression.

Statistics and computing·2025

Area of Science:

  • Statistical Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genotyping errors are often overlooked in genetic mapping studies.
  • Unaccounted errors can severely distort linkage evidence and statistical analysis.
  • Accurate statistical genetic analysis requires robust methods for handling genotyping errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel methods for calculating pedigree likelihoods that explicitly account for genotyping errors.
  • To extend existing deterministic and stochastic algorithms to incorporate realistic error models.
  • To demonstrate the utility of error-aware statistical genetic analyses through practical examples.

Main Methods:

  • Extension of the Lander-Green-Kruglyak deterministic algorithm for small pedigrees.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adaptation of the Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) stochastic algorithm for large pedigrees.
  • Development of flexible error models without restrictive assumptions (e.g., single error per pedigree).

    • Main Results:

    • New algorithms successfully integrate genotyping error into pedigree likelihood calculations.
    • Demonstrated ability to estimate error rates from pedigree data.
    • Computation of posterior mistyping probabilities for both Mendelian-consistent and inconsistent errors.
    • Enabled selection of the correct pedigree structure among competing hypotheses.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed methods allow for robust statistical genetic analyses in the presence of genotyping errors.
    • These approaches enhance the accuracy of gene mapping, paternity testing, and twin zygosity testing.
    • Ignoring genotyping errors can lead to significant inaccuracies; accounting for them provides more reliable genetic insights.