Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perspectives on CPR: resuscitation or resurrection?

J Saunders1

  • 1Nevill Hall Hospital, Abergavenny, Monmouthshire.

Clinical Medicine (London, England)
|January 17, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) use is debated, with recent age discrimination claims. New guidance clarifies that CPR is not mandated if there

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The benefits of plain language summaries in public health publishing.

Perspectives in public health·2025
Same author

Thermodynamic Evidence for Density Wave Order in a Two Dimensional ^{4}He Supersolid.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Role of accompanist in pain medicine consultations: the patient perspective.

Irish medical journal·2023
Same author

Quantum bath suppression in a superconducting circuit by immersion cooling.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Electronuclear Transition into a Spatially Modulated Magnetic State in YbRh_{2}Si_{2}.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Supercooling of the A phase of <sup>3</sup>He.

Nature communications·2023

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Cardiology
  • Geriatric Medicine

Background:

  • The use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a complex medical and ethical issue.
  • Recent allegations of age discrimination in CPR decisions have raised significant concerns.
  • Existing legal frameworks and professional guidelines require careful consideration.

Observation:

  • Revised guidance from leading UK medical bodies addresses CPR controversies.
  • The guidance incorporates implications from the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
  • Patient rights regarding futile treatments are a key consideration.

Findings:

  • Patients do not possess an absolute right to treatments with no prospect of success.
  • CPR should be withheld when there is no reasonable likelihood of a positive outcome.
  • Current evidence indicates that legislative interventions may not be beneficial.

Implications:

  • This guidance assists clinicians in navigating ethical dilemmas surrounding CPR.
  • It emphasizes the importance of evidence-based decision-making in end-of-life care.
  • The framework supports equitable application of CPR, irrespective of age.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos