Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A statistical interpretive method for neuropsychological test data.

L S Miller1, M L Rohling

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-3013, USA. lsmiller@egonpsy.uga.edu

Neuropsychology Review
|January 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Magnetic Monopole Pair Production in Ultraperipheral Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.36  TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Simultaneous Unbinned Differential Cross-Section Measurement of Twenty-Four Z+jets Kinematic Observables with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Use and Psychometric Properties of the MoCA in Spain: a Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Health Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury: An Umbrella Review.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

A Systematic Review of Functional Brain Imaging Studies in Neurofibromatosis 1.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Editorial March, 2026 Neuropsychology Review.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Treating Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Cognitive Domain.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Immersive Virtual Reality in Neuropsychological Assessment of Acquired Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neuropsychology review·2026
See all related articles

Rohling's Interpretive Method (RIM) offers a statistically sound approach to interpreting neuropsychological tests. This method aids in evaluating complex cognitive data, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Clinical Assessment

Background:

  • Interpreting extensive neuropsychological test data in flexible batteries is challenging.
  • Current methods can be subjective and lack consistent psychometric grounding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce Rohling's Interpretive Method (RIM), a novel statistical approach for neuropsychological data interpretation.
  • Provide a psychometrically sound framework for flexible neuropsychological test batteries.
  • Enhance the objectivity and replicability of neuropsychological assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a statistically based interpretation and evaluation method (RIM).
  • Incorporated informed clinical judgment regarding confidence levels for tests, domains, and indices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detailed systematic procedures for method replication.
  • Illustrated with two clinical case examples (cerebrovascular insult, mixed etiology).

    • Main Results:

    • RIM accommodates varying numbers of tests and cognitive domains.
    • The method remains psychometrically based, ensuring reliability.
    • Case examples demonstrate practical application across diverse clinical scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • RIM offers a practical and user-friendly solution for complex neuropsychological data interpretation.
    • The method supports informed clinical decision-making.
    • RIM has potential for widespread adoption in clinical neuropsychology, despite potential limitations.