Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protocols and guidelines in critical care: development and implementation.

J J Hammond1

  • 1Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA. hammond@umdnj.edu

Current Opinion in Critical Care
|January 24, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term renoprotection by perindopril or nifedipine in non-hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2004
Same author

Long-term comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2001
Same author

Treatment of giardiasis.

Postgraduate medicine·1996
Same author

A comparison of isradipine and felodipine in Australian patients with hypertension: focus on ankle oedema. The Physician's Study Group.

Blood pressure·1993
Same author

A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group.

American journal of hypertension·1993
Same author

The Belle Maudsley memorial lecture 1986. Treatment of maxillary retrusion in a case of cleft lip and palate.

Dental update·1987
Same journal

Cardiogenic shock - toward phenotype-directed, precision management.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

The future of critical care nutrition: from calorie counting to precision personalized metabolism therapy.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Editorial introduction.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Generative artificial intelligence for outcome prediction in critical care: the future is now?

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Feeding under support in critical care illness: metabolic and nutritional management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Multinational collaborations in critical care research: feasible and useful?

Current opinion in critical care·2026
See all related articles

Clinical guidelines help standardize intensive care unit (ICU) care, reducing complications and improving patient outcomes. Evidence-based medicine in critical care faces challenges, but guidelines show success in areas like sedation and ventilation.

Area of Science:

  • Critical care medicine
  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Clinical guideline development

Background:

  • Clinical management variation is linked to poor patient outcomes and higher healthcare costs.
  • Standardization of care through guidelines, protocols, and clinical pathways aims to reduce variation.
  • This strategy seeks to decrease complications, shorten hospital stays, and enhance patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution and impact of clinical guidelines in intensive care units (ICUs).
  • To highlight the challenges in applying evidence-based medicine principles to critical care.
  • To identify successful applications of ICU-based guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on clinical management variation and guideline implementation in ICUs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials within critical care settings.
  • Identification of specific clinical areas where ICU guidelines have demonstrated success.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical guidelines are a key strategy for standardizing care and mitigating negative outcomes in ICUs.
    • The complex nature of critical care presents significant hurdles for traditional evidence-based medicine research.
    • Guidelines have proven effective in areas such as sedation, ventilator management, antibiotic selection, and vascular interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardizing clinical management through guidelines is crucial for improving ICU care quality and efficiency.
    • Overcoming research limitations in critical care is necessary for robust guideline development.
    • Successful implementation of guidelines in specific ICU domains demonstrates their potential to enhance patient care.