Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences between conduction aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia.

F Anzaki1, S Izumi

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Social Insurance Chuo General Hospital, Japan.

The Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine
|January 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Conduction aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia exhibit distinct speech sound error patterns. Conduction aphasia involves vowel errors during word search, while Wernicke's aphasia shows consonant errors, especially in severe cases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer.

Nature·2025
Same author

Cis-regulatory elements of the cholinergic gene locus in the silkworm Bombyx mori.

Insect molecular biology·2021
Same author

<i>Mucor</i> pulmonary embolism in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Respiratory medicine case reports·2020
Same author

Topical application of glycyrrhetinic acid in the gingival sulcus inhibits attachment loss in lipopolysaccharide-induced experimental periodontitis in rats.

Journal of periodontal research·2018
Same author

Rapid and sensitive detection of neuron specific enolase with a polydopamine coated plasmonic chip utilizing a rear-side coupling method.

The Analyst·2018
Same author

Factors affecting the potential for posterior bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics
  • Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

  • Conduction aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia are distinct language disorders.
  • Auditory language comprehension levels often differentiate these aphasia types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare speech sound errors in Japanese patients with conduction aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia.
  • To identify qualitative differences in the speech production of these two aphasia types.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of speech sound errors across various language modalities (naming, repetition).
  • Comparison of error patterns (vowel vs. consonant) between conduction aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia patient groups.
  • Inclusion of patients with varying severity of Wernicke's aphasia.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Conduction aphasia patients displayed "conduites d'approche" and phonological paraphasia, with more vowel than consonant errors.
  • Mild Wernicke's aphasia patients showed varied errors; severe cases exhibited neologisms.
  • Conduction aphasia patients appeared to search for words using correct consonants and incorrect vowels.
  • Wernicke's aphasia patients with severe auditory impairment made more consonant than vowel errors.

Conclusions:

  • Speech sound error patterns in conduction aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia are qualitatively distinct.
  • Error characteristics provide insights into the underlying speech production mechanisms for each aphasia type.