Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus-feature specific negative priming.

J De Houwer1, K Rothermund, D Wentura

  • 1University of Southampton, England. jandh@soton.ac.uk

Memory & Cognition
|February 1, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alterations in c-Myc phenotypes resulting from dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1)-mediated mitochondrial fission.

Cell death & disease·2013
Same author

[Dimensions and interpretative patterns of aging: attitudes about aging, being old and ways of living in old age].

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie·2011
Same author

[Zones of transition: dimensions and interpretative patterns of aging].

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie·2011
Same author

Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting.

Behavioural pharmacology·2004
Same author

Contingency awareness and evaluative conditioning: when will it be enough?

Consciousness and cognition·2002
Same author

Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning.

Psychological bulletin·2001
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Ignoring a stimulus feature previously slows down responses to that specific feature. This selective inhibition mechanism in cognitive psychology is more potent than previously understood.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Information Processing
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Selective attention allows individuals to process relevant information while ignoring distractions.
  • Negative priming describes the phenomenon where previously ignored stimuli are responded to more slowly.
  • The underlying mechanisms of negative priming, such as selective inhibition or episodic retrieval, are debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate stimulus-feature specific negative priming effects.
  • To test hypotheses regarding the mechanisms responsible for negative priming, specifically ruling out response conflict and task switching difficulties.
  • To determine if selective inhibition or episodic encoding mechanisms operate with greater specificity and power than previously assumed.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two experiments were conducted involving stimulus presentation and response time measurements.
  • Participants were required to attend to or ignore specific features of stimuli across prime and probe trials.
  • Statistical analyses were used to assess response times and the significance of priming effects.

Main Results:

  • Response times increased significantly when a stimulus feature previously ignored was re-presented.
  • Data from Experiment 2 refuted the response conflict hypothesis, indicating priming was not due to automatic retrieval of prime responses.
  • Experiment 2 also demonstrated that task switching difficulties did not account for the observed effects, reinforcing stimulus-feature specificity.

Conclusions:

  • Negative priming effects are demonstrably stimulus-feature specific.
  • Selective inhibition and episodic encoding mechanisms underlying negative priming are more specific and powerful than previously theorized.
  • These findings advance our understanding of attentional control and memory processes in human cognition.