Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Development of the Functional Assessment Taxonomy.

E A Gaudino1, L N Matheson, F A Mael

  • 1American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
|February 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Standardized evaluation of work capacity.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Workers' compensation managed care: Preliminary findings.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Functional capacity evaluation as a facilitator of social security disability program reform.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
Same author

Rehabilitation ergonomists: standards for development.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
Same author

The importance of a person-centered ecological approach to rehabilitation ergonomics: reply to Rice.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
Same author

Impact of the Dayton Tire case.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
Same journal

Correction: Determinants of Sustainable Return to Work After Burnout or Depression: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Are There Differences in Return-to-Work Experiences for Workers Who Acquired COVID-19 at Work Compared to Workers who Sustained a Non-COVID-19 Work-Related Injury or Illness?

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Association Between Mental Health of Patients with Work-Related Injury and Their Compensation Claim Status: Exploratory Findings from the IMPRovE Trial.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Longterm Persistence and Scalability of a Coordinated Return to Work Model in Healthcare: A Registry-Based Study Across Clinical Pathways.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Supporting Work Participation in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disorders: Outcomes from Work-Able Solutions a Multisite Work-Focused Occupational Therapy Intervention.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Cost-Consequence Analysis of the Return to Work (RTW) Program for Workers with Disabilities in Indonesia: Health, Economic and Productivity Outcomes.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

A new Functional Assessment Taxonomy classifies 131 constructs for assessing functional abilities in people with medical impairments to determine work disability. This structured approach aids in consistent evaluation for disability claims.

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Occupational Health
  • Disability Evaluation

Background:

  • Assessing functional abilities is crucial for determining work disability.
  • Existing methods for evaluating functional capacity can be inconsistent.
  • A standardized classification system is needed to organize assessment constructs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the development and presentation of the Functional Assessment Taxonomy.
  • To provide a method for classifying and organizing constructs used in functional ability assessments.
  • To support the determination of work disability for individuals with medical impairments.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a taxonomy with 131 constructs.
  • Organized constructs into 33 conceptual factors nested within 5 domains.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Defined and categorized each construct based on the work disability model and common units of analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • The Functional Assessment Taxonomy was developed and presented.
    • The taxonomy offers a structured classification of 131 constructs.
    • Constructs are organized hierarchically within 5 domains and 33 conceptual factors.

    Conclusions:

    • The Functional Assessment Taxonomy provides a systematic method for classifying functional assessment constructs.
    • The taxonomy can enhance consistency and clarity in work disability evaluations.
    • Potential applications include the Disability Methodology Redesign Project and other disability assessment initiatives.