Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Explaining own and others' behavior in a controversial issue: animal experimentation.

A B Kemdal1, H Montgomery

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden. Anna.Blom-Kemdal@bet.hkr.se

The Journal of Social Psychology
|February 6, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The need for radical climate interventions: six years to secure humanity's 'liveable future'.

Anaesthesia·2024
Same author

2021 Canadian Surgery Forum: Virtual, online Sept. 21-24, 2021.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

The relationship between minority stress factors and suicidal ideation and behaviours amongst transgender and gender non-conforming adults: A systematic review.

Journal of affective disorders·2021
Same author

In pursuit of the unicorn.

Experimental physiology·2020
Same author

Could patient-controlled thirst-driven fluid administration lead to more rapid rehydration than clinician-directed fluid management? An early feasibility study.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

Critical care at the end of life: balancing technology with compassion and agreeing when to stop.

British journal of anaesthesia·2017
Same journal

War and Terrorism Perceptions a Decade Later: Target Distinction or Ethnic-Cultural Bias?

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

You Must Eat Less Meat! Effects of Issue Importance on Reactance to Meat-Reduction Messages.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Distributed Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Healthcare: Moderated Mediation of Psychological Capital and Emotional Exhaustion.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Threat-Induced Conservatism in a Liberal Electorate: Issue-Based Shifts without Ideological Transformation.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Exploring schadenfreude from the perspectives of deservingness and terror management theories.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Shame, Humiliation and Pride on Revenge Desire and Behavior in Victims of Crime: A Pilot Experimental Study.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
See all related articles

Researchers and animal welfare advocates showed bias in attributing behavior, a common psychological effect. However, perspective-taking reversed this bias, revealing complex social dynamics in attitude formation regarding animal experimentation.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Attitude Formation
  • Animal Experimentation Ethics

Background:

  • Understanding intergroup attributions is crucial for conflict resolution.
  • Animal experimentation is a contentious issue with polarized viewpoints.
  • The actor-observer effect influences how individuals perceive behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine attributional biases between opposing groups in the animal experimentation debate.
  • To investigate the role of perspective-taking in mitigating these biases.
  • To explore how social context shapes attitude defense.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of attributional explanations for behavior.
  • Utilizing an actor-observer effect paradigm.
  • Assessing perspective-taking capabilities between groups.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchEmpirical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both researchers and animal welfare advocates exhibited the actor-observer effect.
  • Perspective-taking led to a reversal of the actor-observer effect.
  • Participants' attitudes influenced their attributions of the opposing group's behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Attributional biases are prevalent in groups with differing stances on animal experimentation.
  • Empathy and perspective-taking can reduce intergroup biases.
  • Attitudes are actively formed and defended within social contexts.