Related Experiment Videos
Diverse knowledges and competing interests: an essay on socio-technical problem-solving
1University of Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. vdn@sympatico.ca
Science and Engineering Ethics
|February 14, 2002
Summary
Solving complex socio-technical problems requires cognitive diversity, social diversity, and pragmatism. Integrating diverse, valid knowledge defines the solution space for these challenges.
Area of Science:
- Socio-technical systems analysis
- Environmental policy and management
Background:
- Complex problems integrate technical and social dimensions.
- Diverse knowledge and competing interests are inherent in socio-technical challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the essential components for solving complex socio-technical problems.
- To demonstrate the interplay of cognitive and social diversity with pragmatism.
Main Methods:
- Case study analysis of Canadian pulp and paper mill pollution.
- Case study analysis of nuclear reactor siting in California.
Main Results:
- Cognitive diversity necessitates recognizing and validating diverse knowledge sources.
- Social diversity highlights the role of competing interests.
- Pragmatism is crucial for navigating these complexities.
Conclusions:
- Effective problem-solving hinges on integrating diverse, validated knowledge.
- The solution space for socio-technical problems is shaped by this integration.