Guest editorial: the ethics in human research ethics

Area of Science:

• Bioethics
• Moral Philosophy
• Research Ethics

Background:

• Common assumptions regarding moral dilemmas and the fact/value dichotomy are prevalent.
• These assumptions can negatively impact ethical problem-solving in human research.

Purpose of the Study:

• To challenge false assumptions in moral reasoning.
• To highlight the interconnectedness of facts and values in ethical problem-solving.
• To facilitate the primary aim of the Joint Ethical Review and Human Experimentation Regulations (JERHRE) in human research.

Main Methods:

• Conceptual analysis of moral reasoning and ethical frameworks.
• Examination of the fact/value dichotomy in ethical discourse.
• Literature review on moral science and research ethics.

Main Results:

• Identified common, yet false, assumptions that impede ethical problem-solving.
• Demonstrated the deep-seated connection between facts and values in everyday morality.
• Argued for the necessity of revised assumptions for effective ethical practice.

Conclusions:

• Overcoming misconceptions in moral reasoning is crucial for advancing research ethics.
• A more nuanced understanding of the fact/value relationship is essential for ethical problem-solving.
• Improved assumptions will support the development of moral science and ethical conduct in human research.