Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pattern and process in the evolution of learning.

Mauricio R Papini1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth 76129, USA. m.papini@tcu.edu

Psychological Review
|February 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Frustrative nonreward: A century of progress.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Psychological self-medication in mammals: A dialogue between natural observations and laboratory research.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2025
Same author

Frustrative nonreward, sucrose consumption, and the basal ganglia: Role of chemogenetic activation of projections from the nucleus accumbens to the globus pallidus internus, globus pallidus externus, and ventral pallidum.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2025
Same author

Ketamine retards recovery from reward downshift and supports conditioned taste aversion.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·2024
Same author

Flexible Behavioral Adjustment to Frustrative Nonreward in Anticipatory Behavior, but Not in Consummatory Behavior, Requires the Dorsal Hippocampus.

Hippocampus·2024
Same author

Frustrative Nonreward: Behavior, Circuits, Neurochemistry, and Disorders.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Comparative learning research needs updated foundations. Learning stability across species mirrors other biological traits, suggesting evolutionary approaches are key for understanding learning mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Comparative psychology
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Behavioral neuroscience

Background:

  • A century of research on learning phenotypes across species has occurred since E. L. Thorndike's foundational work.
  • The stability of learning phenotypes across species is comparable to other genotypic and phenotypic biological characters.
  • Current comparative research employs similar strategies from ecological and general-process perspectives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reassess the metatheoretical foundations of comparative psychology of learning.
  • To explore the integration of learning and evolutionary biology.
  • To establish criteria for studying the evolution of learning mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of learning phenotypes across species.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of research strategies in ecological and general-process views of learning.
  • Review of criteria used in other biological research for evolutionary studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Learning phenotypes exhibit stability across species, similar to other biological traits.
    • Researchers utilize convergent strategies when approaching comparative learning problems.
    • The study highlights the need for evolutionary frameworks in comparative learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Comparative psychology of learning requires a metatheoretical reassessment.
    • Integrating learning and evolution necessitates criteria for studying divergence, homology, and homoplasy of learning mechanisms.
    • The field can benefit from established biological research methodologies for evolutionary analysis.