Predictors of course completion for the U.S. Army pharmacy specialist course
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
Andrew B Meadows1, Brian K Stanton, Jennifer R Styles
1Pharmacy Branch, Department of Clinical Support Services, U.S. Army-Baylor University Program, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, 3151 Scott Road, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of successful completion of the U.S. Army Medical Department pharmacy specialist (91Q) training program. The sample consisted of 143 students from four course iterations, and only students enrolled in the course for the first time were included for analysis. The relationship between 16 predictor variables and successful completion was assessed. Five variables, the ranks of private (E1) and specialist (E4), cross-trainee status, gender, and Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) general technical (GT) score, were found to be significant predictors using simple linear regression. Using hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis, three variables, service component, gender, and ASVAB GT score, were found to have a significant unique shared variance with success. The results of this study indicate that ASVAB GT scores are predictive of success (p < 0.01) in the 91Q training program. Using these predictors, the selection process may be modified to improve the likelihood of student success in the course.
Related Concept Videos
Time Course of Drug Effect
Three-Compartment Open Model
Chronopharmacokinetics: Time-Dependent Pharmacokinetics
Time-dependent pharmacokinetics refers to non-cyclical changes in drug rate processes over a period of time. It can lead to nonlinear pharmacokinetics, where the relationship between drug concentration and time is not proportional. Non-cyclical...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components