Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Timing goals in bimanual coordination.

A Semjen1, J J Summers

  • 1Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences Cognitives, CNRS, Marseille, France. semjen@lnf.cnrs-mrs.fr

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|March 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associations of Later-Life Education, the BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism and Cognitive Change in Older Adults.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2020
Same author

The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism moderates the relationship between cognitive reserve and executive function.

Translational psychiatry·2015
Same author

Reducing false positive diagnoses in mild cognitive impairment: the importance of comprehensive neuropsychological assessment.

European journal of neurology·2014
Same author

Voluntary attention and the spacing effect.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

The role of timing in motor program representation.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

The relationship between the sequencing and timing components of a skill.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

A new model suggests bimanual rhythmic movements, like 1:2 finger tapping, are controlled by a single internal timekeeper. This central temporal coupling hypothesis explains hand coordination, even with altered movement trajectories.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human movement science
  • Cognitive neuroscience

Background:

  • Bimanual rhythmic movements require precise coordination between hands.
  • Existing theories propose phase coupling of movement trajectories for coordination.
  • A 1:2 frequency ratio in bimanual tapping presents a unique coordination challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and test the central temporal coupling (CTC) view as an alternative mechanism for bimanual rhythmic movements.
  • To investigate if a single internal timekeeper can govern movements with a 1:2 frequency ratio.
  • To examine the influence of movement trajectory modifications on temporal coordination patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model based on the CTC hypothesis for 1:2 tapping.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted an experiment involving bimanual tapping at 1:1 and 1:2 frequency ratios.
  • Manipulated finger contact duration (short vs. long) to alter movement trajectories.

    • Main Results:

    • The variance-covariance pattern of tap timing supported the CTC model's predictions.
    • This pattern remained consistent despite modifications in movement trajectories due to prolonged finger contact.
    • The central timekeeper model accurately predicted coordination under different tapping ratios and contact conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • The central temporal coupling hypothesis provides a viable explanation for bimanual rhythmic coordination, particularly at a 1:2 frequency ratio.
    • Motor execution details, such as finger contact duration, do not fundamentally alter the underlying temporal control mechanism.
    • This study supports the role of a unified internal timekeeper in coordinating complex bimanual movements.