Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scar assessment tools: implications for current research.

Paul P M van Zuijlen1, Adam P Angeles, Robert W Kreis

  • 1Burn Center, Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Vondellaan 13, 1942 LE Beverwijk, The Netherlands. pwcpzl@rkz.nl

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|March 9, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of the pediatric patient scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for burn scars: A qualitative study.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same author

The Course of Scar Formation and Predictors of Scar Quality in 490 Paediatric Burn Patients During the First Year Post-Burn.

Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society·2026
Same author

Safety and efficacy of bio-engineered, autologous dermo-epidermal skin grafts in reconstructive surgery: 1-year results of a prospective, randomized, intra-patient controlled, multicenter phase II clinical trial.

Journal of tissue engineering·2026
Same author

Safety and efficacy of bio-engineered, autologous dermo-epidermal skin grafts in adolescent and adult burn patients: 1-year results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter phase IIB clinical trial.

EClinicalMedicine·2025
Same author

Fibroblast Dynamics Following Partial and Deep Burn Injury in a Reconstructed Human Skin Model.

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine·2025
Same author

Scar Quality After Burns in Relation to Skin Type, Classified by Device-Based Colour Measurement, as an Alternative for the Fitzpatrick Questionnaire.

International wound journal·2025
Same journal

Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

"Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating scar tissue is crucial for addressing cosmetic and functional issues. This review examines current and future tools for objective and subjective scar assessment, aiding in better treatment strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology and Biomedical Engineering
  • Wound Healing and Tissue Repair

Background:

  • Scarring presents significant cosmetic and functional challenges.
  • Scar tissue exhibits distinct clinical and histological differences from normal skin, including aberrant color, texture, thickness (hypertrophy), contraction, and firmness.
  • Histological changes involve altered dermal architecture and the presence of myofibroblasts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review currently available objective and subjective assessment tools for scar tissue.
  • To discuss potential future devices for scar evaluation.
  • To address the lack of general agreement on the most appropriate scar assessment tools.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing scar assessment methodologies.
  • Critical discussion of objective measurement tools (e.g., profilometry, colorimetry).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of subjective assessment tools (e.g., patient/observer scar rating scales).

    • Main Results:

    • A variety of objective and subjective tools exist for scar assessment.
    • No universal consensus has been reached on the optimal tool for evaluating scar tissue.
    • Emerging technologies may offer improved future scar assessment capabilities.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized and validated tools are needed for consistent scar evaluation.
    • Objective and subjective assessments should ideally be combined for comprehensive scar analysis.
    • Further research into novel technologies is warranted to improve scar assessment and management.