Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026
09:36
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Errors in anthropometric measurements in neonates and infants
D Harrison1, H Harker, H D Heese
1Carinus Nursing College, Groote Schuur Hospital.
Curationis
|March 12, 2002
Summary
Infant measurement accuracy in Cape Town is questionable. Studies reveal significant variations and inaccuracies in weight, length, and age assessments, highlighting a need for standardized methods and education to ensure reliable child health monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Biomedical Measurement
Background:
- Previous surveys indicated potential inaccuracies in infant measurement methods in Cape Town.
- Variability in weight, length, and age assessment techniques raised concerns about reliable health monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively assess the accuracy of current infant measurement methods in Cape Town hospitals and clinics.
- To identify discrepancies in length, weight, and age measurements used for neonates and infants.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated three crown-heel length measurement tools: measuring board, mat, and tape measure.
- Compared infant weight differences based on clothing (naked, diaper only, fully clothed).
- Assessed age estimation accuracy using calendar dates versus an electronic calculator.
Main Results:
- Significant institutional variations in infant measurement techniques were observed.
- Many current measurement methods were found to be inaccurate.
- Discrepancies were noted across different measurement tools and clothing conditions.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for standardization and accuracy in infant measurements in Cape Town.
- Effective educational programs are essential to improve measurement accuracy.
- Accurate measurements are vital for effective monitoring of young children's health.
Related Concept Videos
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...