Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Probability matching: encouraging optimal responding in humans.

Edmund Fantino1, Ali Esfandiari

  • 1Department of Psychology-0109, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA. efantino@ucsd.edu

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale
|March 21, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Undergraduates in a probability task sought optimal strategies, partially confirming a 100% success hypothesis. Providing probabilities and asking for strategy recommendations improved performance, though optimal choice was not achieved.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in Mood, Optimism, and Risk-Taking Behavior Between American and Chinese College Students.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

Increased False-Memory Susceptibility After Mindfulness Meditation.

Psychological science·2015
Same author

Regulating the way to obesity: unintended consequences of limiting sugary drink sizes.

PloS one·2013
Same author

Choices between segmented and unsegmented schedules and the self-control paradigm.

Behavioural processes·2012
Same author

Hyperbolic discounting of delayed social interaction.

Learning & behavior·2012
Same author

GAMBLING: SOMETIMES UNSEEMLY; NOT WHAT IT SEEMS.

Analysis of gambling behavior·2011

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision-making research

Background:

  • Probability matching tasks are common in decision-making research.
  • Understanding human strategy selection in probabilistic environments is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate undergraduate students' strategy selection in a repeated-trials binary choice procedure.
  • To test the hypothesis that subjects aim for a 100% success rate in probability-matching tasks.

Main Methods:

  • 200 undergraduates completed 192 trials of a binary choice task with a 75% correct outcome probability.
  • Five conditions were implemented: control, provided probabilities, early exit incentive, competition, and strategy recommendation.
  • A manipulation assessed if subjects sought a 100% correct strategy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The hypothesis that subjects seek a 100% success strategy was partially supported.
  • Providing actual probabilities and asking for strategy recommendations significantly improved performance.
  • All groups showed significant improvement over trials, but no group achieved optimal choice.

Conclusions:

  • Human decision-making in probability tasks may be driven by a desire for perfect outcomes.
  • Specific interventions, like providing explicit probabilities or peer strategy recommendation, can enhance performance.
  • Despite improvements, achieving true optimal choice in such tasks remains a challenge.