Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Using comparison charts to assess performance measurement data.

Kwan Y Lee1, Christine McGreevey

  • 1Division of Research, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, USA. klee@jcaho.org

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|March 21, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retrospective claims database analysis to determine relationship between renin-angiotensin system agents, rehospitalization, and health care costs in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.

Clinical therapeutics·2009
Same author

Promoter methylation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling antagonist Dkk-3 is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer.

Cancer·2008
Same author

Gender and age differences in medications dispensed from a national chain drugstore.

Journal of women's health (2002)·2008
Same author

The Medicare Part D doughnut hole: effect on pharmacy utilization.

Managed care interface·2007
Same author

Withdrawal of COX-2 selective inhibitors rofecoxib and valdecoxib: impact on NSAID and gastroprotective drug prescribing and utilization.

Current medical research and opinion·2007
Same author

The tumor suppressor Wnt inhibitory factor 1 is frequently methylated in nasopharyngeal and esophageal carcinomas.

Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology·2007
Same journal

Conference overview: through the patient's eyes--improvement tools for the new millennium.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

The new Northwestern Memorial Hospital: planned, constructed, and operated through the patients first philosophy.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Developing partnerships among patients, families, and staff at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Quality improvements in end of life care: insights from two collaboratives.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

The ORYX initiative uses comparison charts to assess healthcare performance. These charts help identify exemplary, average, or substandard performance, guiding improvement efforts for healthcare organizations.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Performance Measurement in Healthcare

Background:

  • The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) introduced the ORYX initiative in 1997.
  • ORYX integrates performance measurement data into the healthcare accreditation process.
  • JCAHO utilizes control and comparison charts to analyze performance trends for healthcare organizations (HCOs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the role and utility of comparison charts within the JCAHO ORYX initiative.
  • To guide healthcare organizations in understanding and utilizing performance data for quality improvement.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison charts graphically summarize performance analysis, including actual rates, expected rates, and expected ranges.
  • Expected ranges indicate the statistical certainty of a data point differing from the population average.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis involves comparing an HCO's outcomes against a comparison group or risk-adjusted data.

    • Main Results:

    • Comparison charts categorize performance as exemplary, average, or substandard, highlighting areas for improvement.
    • They provide HCOs with insights into whether to maintain current performance or pursue enhancements.
    • The data informs surveyors about HCOs' performance measure selection, analysis, and improvement outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Comparison charts are essential tools for evaluating healthcare performance within the ORYX framework.
    • They facilitate data-driven decision-making for quality improvement in healthcare organizations.
    • Effective use of these charts supports accreditation and enhances patient care outcomes.