Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning counterfactually: combining and rending.

R Revlin1, C L Cate, T S Rouss

  • 1Psychology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106, USA. revlin@psych.ucsb.edu

Memory & Cognition
|March 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensible reasoning in two tasks: rule discovery and hypothesis evaluation.

Memory & cognition·1989
Same author

The belief-bias effect in formal reasoning: the influence of knowledge on logic.

Memory & cognition·1980
Same author

Understanding quantified categorical expressions.

Memory & cognition·1980
Same author

Comparative trauma to blood in the disc oxygenator and membrane lung.

Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs·1969
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

People revise beliefs during counterfactual reasoning by assuming a fact is false to draw conclusions. Students prioritized general statements over specific ones when reconciling these logical conflicts.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Logic and Reasoning

Background:

  • Counterfactual reasoning involves revising beliefs when a presumed fact is treated as false.
  • Understanding how individuals reconcile inconsistencies is key to cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To simulate belief revision in counterfactual reasoning.
  • To investigate how students resolve logical inconsistencies arising from counterfactual assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Students were presented with consistent statements, then asked to accept a counterfactual assumption.
  • Participants reconciled inconsistencies between general rules, specific facts, and counterfactuals.
  • The study analyzed preferences in resolving these logical conflicts.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Students favored maintaining general statements as true and specific statements as false.
  • This preference was stronger when assumptions integrated categories and when real beliefs were involved.
  • Results align with natural deduction, mental models, and conceptual-integration network theories.

Conclusions:

  • Belief revision in counterfactual reasoning shows predictable patterns.
  • Cognitive models of inference adequately explain how individuals handle counterfactuals.
  • The study provides empirical support for existing theories of everyday reasoning.