Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment?

A Karniel1, F A Mussa-Ivaldi

  • 1Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical School, and Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL 60611, USA. karniel@northwestern.edu

Experimental Brain Research
|March 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Myoelectric Computer Interface for Reducing Abnormal Muscle Activations after Spinal Cord Injury.

IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]·2019
Same author

Changes in neuromuscular activity during motor training with a body-machine interface after spinal cord injury.

IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]·2017
Same author

Toward Perceiving Robots as Humans: Three Handshake Models Face the Turing-Like Handshake Test.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

A body-machine interface for training selective pelvis movements in stroke survivors: A pilot study.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2016
Same author

Perception and Action in Teleoperated Needle Insertion.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2015
Same author

Robot-amplified manual exploration improves load identification.

IFMBE proceedings·2015
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Humans struggle to switch between internal models for arm movement control when faced with alternating mechanical perturbations. This suggests the brain prefers a single model for adapting to changing forces.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Robotics in neuroscience
  • Human motor learning

Background:

  • Motor adaptation involves creating internal models of environmental dynamics.
  • Previous research shows adaptation to predictable mechanical perturbations.
  • The ability to switch between multiple internal models is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if humans can develop and switch between two distinct internal models of force fields.
  • To test the hypothesis of flexible internal model switching in motor control.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed reaching movements using a robotic manipulandum.
  • Force fields were applied, alternating direction after each movement on day 1 and day 4.
  • Single force fields were applied and learned on day 2 and day 3.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Subjects could not learn to switch between two alternating force fields.
  • Extensive training did not improve performance with alternating perturbations.
  • Single force fields were learned effectively when applied consistently.

Conclusions:

  • The human central nervous system shows a strong bias towards using a single internal model.
  • Flexible switching between multiple internal models for motor control appears limited.
  • Findings challenge the hypothesis of easily switchable internal representations for dynamic environments.