Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is clinical practice variability the major reason for differences in pathology requesting patterns in general

W S A Smellie1, M J Galloway, D Chinn

  • 1Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK. info@smellie.com

Journal of Clinical Pathology
|March 29, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using 'candidacy' as a framework for understanding access to mainstream psychological treatment for people with intellectual disabilities and common mental health problems within the English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies service.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2016
Same author

Demand management and test request rationalization.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2012
Same author

Time to harmonise common laboratory test profiles.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2012
Same author

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 13.

Journal of clinical pathology·2011
Same author

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 14.

Journal of clinical pathology·2011
Same author

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 12.

Journal of clinical pathology·2010

This study examined whether differences in pathology test requesting among general practices could be explained by factors like patient demographics or practice resources. Researchers analyzed test patterns across 22 practices serving 165,000 patients. They found little correlation between sociodemographic indicators and test rates. A weak link was found between elderly patient proportions and one test type. Overall, the study suggests that individual clinical decisions are the main reason for variability in test requesting. These findings indicate that test patterns could be modified with targeted interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Primary care clinical practice variability
  • Health services research in general practice
  • Diagnostic testing patterns in outpatient settings

Background:

General practice pathology requesting shows significant variation across different clinics. Prior research has shown that patient demographics and practice resources influence some clinical behaviors. However, no prior work had resolved whether these factors fully explain differences in pathology test ordering. This gap motivated a closer examination of whether sociodemographic or structural indicators could account for observed variability. Researchers already knew that clinical decision-making varies, but uncertainty remained about the extent to which this variation is modifiable. The study aimed to determine if external factors could explain differences in test requesting. No clear evidence existed linking specific patient proportions to test rates. The study sought to address this uncertainty by analyzing data from multiple practices.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to determine if differences in pathology test requesting among general practices could be explained by sociodemographic or structural factors. Researchers focused on a single district with 22 practices serving 165,000 patients. They examined 95% of the most commonly requested tests to assess patterns. The goal was to identify whether external indicators influenced test rates. By comparing top and bottom fifths of activity, the study sought to detect trends. The researchers proposed that clinical practice variation might be the main driver of differences. No prior work had tested this hypothesis in such a detailed manner. The findings could inform strategies to standardize test requesting.

Keywords:
clinical practice variationgeneral practice testingpathology test patternshealth services research

Frequently Asked Questions

The study found that differences in pathology test requesting are likely due to clinical practice variation rather than sociodemographic factors.

Creatinine and electrolyte tests showed a weak correlation with elderly patient proportions.

The study found no demonstrable impact of Townsend scores or specialist miniclinics on test requesting patterns.

Researchers used Spearman correlation coefficients and displayed top/bottom fifths graphically to detect trends.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used a comparative analysis of pathology test requesting across 22 general practices. Researchers selected tests representing 95% of all requests in general practice. They calculated Spearman correlation coefficients to assess relationships. The top and bottom fifths of activity were graphically displayed to detect trends. Sociodemographic factors like age and gender proportions were analyzed. Practice characteristics such as Townsend scores and miniclinics were also considered. No other methods were used to assess test patterns. The analysis focused on identifying correlations between indicators and test rates.

Main Results:

The proportion of women of childbearing age did not correlate with test requesting patterns. Median Townsend scores showed no impact on pathology test rates. The presence of specialist miniclinics also failed to influence test activity. A weak correlation was found between elderly patient proportions and creatinine/electrolyte testing. However, this was not observed for other tests in the same group. Large differences remained unexplained by demographic or structural factors. The study found that clinical practice variation likely explains most differences. These findings suggest that test requesting patterns are potentially modifiable.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that differences in pathology test requesting are primarily due to clinical practice variation. They suggest that these differences are potentially amenable to change. No strong correlations were found between sociodemographic factors and test rates. The study did not find evidence linking miniclinics to test activity. The weak correlation with elderly patients was limited to one test type. The findings support the idea that individual clinical decisions drive test requesting. No prior work had demonstrated this link with such clarity. The authors suggest that targeted interventions could reduce variability.

The study included tests representing 95% of all pathology requests in general practice.

The authors suggest that clinical practice variation is the main driver and that these patterns are potentially amenable to change.