Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When does the incongruence length difference test fail?

Pierre Darlu1, Guillaume Lecointre

  • 1INSERM, U535 Génétique épidemiologique et Structure des populations humaines, Bâtiment Gregory Pincus, 80 rue du Général Leclerc, 94276 Le Kremlin Bicêtre Cedex, France. darlu@kb.inserm.fr

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|March 29, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The plague of 1720 and migration in Martigues (France) in the 17th and 18th centuries.

PloS one·2026
Same author

African harps as units of cultural evolution: a cladistic analysis on their morphology.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same author

[Biodiversity : a need for clarification].

Comptes rendus biologies·2024
Same author

Human genetic structure in Northwest France provides new insights into West European historical demography.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Origins and Functional Significance of Eukaryotic Protein Folds.

Journal of molecular evolution·2023
Same author

Revisiting Nature's "Unifying Patterns": A Biological Appraisal.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

The transcriptional and translational outcomes for pseudogenes in bacterial endosymbionts.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

800 million years of co-evolution in the green plant lineage - the case of LEUNIG and SEUSS transcriptional co-regulators.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

The incongruence length difference (ILD) test is conservative for detecting congruence in DNA sequences. It has limited power to identify incongruence from varying evolutionary conditions or tree structures, especially with limited data.

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Molecular Evolution

Background:

  • Assessing congruence between character datasets is crucial in phylogenetic analysis.
  • The incongruence length difference (ILD) test is a common method for this purpose.
  • Understanding the ILD test's efficiency under various evolutionary scenarios is vital.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficiency of the incongruence length difference (ILD) test.
  • To assess the ILD test's power in detecting incongruence under diverse evolutionary conditions and tree topologies.
  • To determine the influence of factors like mutation rates and substitution rate heterogeneity on ILD test performance.

Main Methods:

  • Simulating DNA sequences under various evolutionary conditions, including different tree symmetries, mutation rates, rate variations along branches, and among-site substitution rates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing pairs of sequence sets generated under identical and differing evolutionary parameters.
  • Analyzing the probability of Type-I errors (false rejections of congruence) and the power to detect true incongruence.

    • Main Results:

    • The ILD test exhibited a conservative Type-I error rate, often below the 5% significance level when sequences shared identical evolutionary histories.
    • The probability of rejecting congruence increased significantly when evolutionary conditions (e.g., rate heterogeneity) or tree topologies differed, particularly with more sites and asymmetric trees.
    • The ILD test showed limited power to detect incongruence due to differing evolutionary conditions or tree structures, especially with low informative sites and heterogeneous substitution rates.

    Conclusions:

    • The ILD test is generally conservative and has limited power to detect incongruence arising from variations in evolutionary processes or phylogenetic tree structures.
    • Its effectiveness is enhanced by a large number of characters and homogeneous substitution rates across sites.
    • Researchers should consider these limitations when interpreting ILD test results in phylogenetic analyses.