Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informational masking with small set sizes.

Virginia M Richards1, Zhongzhou Tang, Gerald D Kidd

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|April 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Profile analysis in listeners with normal and elevated audiometric thresholds: Behavioral and modeling results.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2024
Same author

Effects of sound segregation cues on multi-sound intensity discrimination.

JASA express letters·2023
Same author

Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Speech-Driven Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields Beyond the Auditory Cortex.

Hearing research·2021
Same author

Sub-optimal construction of an auditory profile from temporally distributed spectral information.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Small masker sets effectively mimic random maskers in auditory detection tasks, suggesting consistent observer strategies despite variations in masker complexity. This impacts understanding informational masking.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal detection theory

Background:

  • Informational masking (IM) is auditory interference beyond peripheral processing.
  • IM arises from random masker frequencies, complicating sound detection and discrimination.
  • Understanding IM's cognitive mechanisms is crucial for auditory research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if limited masker sets can replicate random masker conditions in IM.
  • To determine if reduced masker variability affects observer detection strategies.
  • To assess the impact of masker set size on informational masking thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Detection thresholds were measured using a tone signal masked by 6-tone maskers.
  • Masker set sizes of 3, 6, 12, 24, and random maskers were tested.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Observer memory for maskers and linear models analyzed decision strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant inter-observer and masker set variability in detection thresholds observed.
    • Memory tests indicated some masker recognition even with set sizes of 24.
    • Linear model analysis showed modest reductions in fit quality with smaller set sizes.

    Conclusions:

    • Limited masker sets can approximate random masker conditions in informational masking.
    • Observer decision strategies remain largely consistent across different masker set sizes.
    • Findings suggest cognitive factors, not just masker randomness, drive informational masking.