Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Generating alternatives: a key component in human reasoning?

Stephen E Newstead1, Valerie A Thompson, Simon J Handley

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, England. snewstead@plymouth.ac.uk

Memory & Cognition
|April 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncertainty monitoring in reasoning: Cue consistency is more important than belief-logic conflict.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

A single process for deductive and inductive inference? Examining the impact of conclusion typicality and argument validity on immediate inferences.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Fast reasoning uses semantic activation as an intuitive cue.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Conflict detection with invalid inferences: All heuristics, no logic.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Logical intuitions or matching heuristics? Examining the effect of deduction training on belief-based reasoning judgments.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Fast reasoning and metacognition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Individual differences in deductive reasoning exist. Some individuals struggle to generate alternative mental models, impacting their reasoning processes and highlighting the importance of assessing this skill.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Reasoning
  • Deductive Inference

Background:

  • Mental models theory posits that deductive reasoning involves generating alternative models to falsify conclusions.
  • Individual variability in cognitive processes, including reasoning, is a recognized area of study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate individual differences in the ability to generate alternative mental models during deductive reasoning.
  • To determine if the capacity for generating alternative representations is a measurable and distinct cognitive skill.

Main Methods:

  • Participants reasoned with syllogisms, and their model generation process was observed.
  • A separate task assessed participants' ability to generate diverse representations of premise pairs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant individual differences were found; some participants generated only one model, while others generated multiple.
  • The ability to generate alternative representations was independently measurable, correlating with reasoning performance.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support mental models theory by demonstrating individual variation in alternative model generation.
  • Alternative model generation represents a potentially important individual difference in cognitive processing styles.