Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recent progress in multiple sequence alignment: a survey.

Cédric Notredame1

  • 1Information Génétique et Structurale, UMR 1889, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13 006 Marseille, France. cedric.notredame@igs.cnrs-mrs.fr

Pharmacogenomics
|April 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fast and accurate multiple-protein-sequence alignment at scale with FAMSA2.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

An nf-core framework for the systematic comparison of alternative modeling tools: the multiple sequence alignment case study.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Empowering bioinformatics communities with Nextflow and nf-core.

Genome biology·2025
Same author

A resource of RNA-binding protein motifs across eukaryotes reveals evolutionary dynamics and gene-regulatory function.

Nature biotechnology·2025
Same author

multistrap: boosting phylogenetic analyses with structural information.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Reconstructing the sequence specificities of RNA-binding proteins across eukaryotes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

Closely similar tacrolimus morning troughs and graft function across the recipients' common <i>ABCB1</i> polymorphisms (<i>c.2677G>T/A</i>, <i>c.1236C>T</i>, <i>c.3435C>T</i>) early after renal transplantation.

Pharmacogenomics·2026
Same journal

Pharmacogenomics for stratified antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: evidence, limits and a roadmap for clinical use.

Pharmacogenomics·2026
Same journal

Guidance from an informed public on collecting and sharing PGx test results for major depressive disorder: "It's no different from your blood type".

Pharmacogenomics·2026
Same journal

Optimizing pharmacogenomics workflows: a qualitative evaluation of clinical service delivery models.

Pharmacogenomics·2026
Same journal

Combinations of single gene predictors with AI-driven polygenic precision therapies in cardiovascular diseases.

Pharmacogenomics·2026
Same journal

Practical guide to implementing pre-emptive pharmacogenetic screening in routine pediatric oncology care.

Pharmacogenomics·2026
See all related articles

Choosing the right multiple sequence alignment (MSA) tool is complex due to varied methods and results. This review guides non-specialists through common MSA packages, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses for effective sequence analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a fundamental task in sequence analysis.
  • Numerous MSA methods exist, yielding diverse results that challenge non-specialists.
  • Selecting the optimal MSA tool requires understanding method-specific performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing multiple sequence alignment techniques.
  • To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of widely used MSA software.
  • To aid non-specialists in choosing appropriate MSA tools for their research.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current multiple sequence alignment methodologies.
  • Comparative analysis of popular multiple alignment software packages.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of performance metrics and potential limitations of different MSA approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Overview of diverse MSA algorithms and their underlying principles.
    • Identification of key strengths and weaknesses for leading MSA tools.
    • Guidance on selecting MSA software based on specific research needs and data characteristics.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the nuances of different MSA methods is crucial for accurate sequence analysis.
    • This review provides a practical guide for selecting the most suitable MSA package.
    • Informed tool selection can significantly improve the reliability of bioinformatics research.