Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans.

N Sigala1, F Gabbiani, N K Logothetis

  • 1Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany. natasha.sigala@tuebingen.mpg.de

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|April 24, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?" [NeuroImage 127 (2016) 242-256].

NeuroImage·2016
Same author

Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?

NeuroImage·2015
Same author

Wireless Neural/EMG Telemetry Systems for Small Freely Moving Animals.

IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems·2013
Same author

Collision-avoidance behaviors of minimally restrained flying locusts to looming stimuli.

The Journal of experimental biology·2013
Same author

Hippocampal-cortical interaction during periods of subcortical silence.

Nature·2012
Same author

Own-species bias in the representations of monkey and human face categories in the primate temporal lobe.

Journal of neurophysiology·2011
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Humans and monkeys use similar strategies for visual categorization, focusing on similarity to known examples rather than abstract rules. This perceptual learning enhances feature discrimination in both species.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Comparative Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Categorization is fundamental to cognition, enabling efficient information processing.
  • Understanding visual categorization in non-human primates offers insights into the evolution of cognitive abilities.
  • Previous research has explored categorization but with less focus on direct comparison of strategies across species using parameterized stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how categorization tasks influence the extraction and representation of perceptual features.
  • To compare visual subordinate categorization strategies between humans and monkeys.
  • To elucidate the underlying mechanisms of perceptual learning during categorization.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized parameterized stimuli (schematic faces and fish) with fixed diagnostic features.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a similarity-rating task to assess categorization strategies.
  • Compared decision-making processes between human and monkey participants.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated perceptual sensitization to diagnostic dimensions in monkeys during the categorization task.
    • Revealed significant similarities in visual subordinate categorization strategies between humans and monkeys.
    • Found that neither species relied on class prototypes or conditional probabilities for classification.

    Conclusions:

    • Both humans and monkeys classify objects based on similarity to familiar category members or decision boundaries.
    • The findings highlight conserved mechanisms in visual categorization across species.
    • Categorization tasks actively shape perceptual feature representation and processing.