[Limitation of intensive care and infant death during the postnatal period]

M Dehan1

  • 1Service de Pédiatrie et Réanimation Néonatales, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte-de-Trivaux, 92141 Clamart Cedex. michel.dehan@abc.ap-hop-paris.fr

Insights

Neonatal intensive care aims to save all newborns. In extreme cases of irreversible brain damage, ethically ending an infant's life postnatally may be considered, offering an alternative to third-trimester abortion.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics

Context:

  • Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) aim to preserve newborn life.
  • Severe, irreversible brain damage can result from life-saving interventions.
  • Physicians face ethical dilemmas regarding life support and intervention termination.

Purpose:

  • To explore the ethical considerations of medical intervention to end an infant's life in neonatal settings.
  • To review discussions among French neonatologists regarding these complex ethical dilemmas.
  • To outline fundamental principles for current recommendations on end-of-life decisions in neonatology.

Summary:

  • Discusses the ethical quandary in neonatal intensive care when saving a life leads to severe, irreversible handicaps.
  • Presents French neonatologists' discussions on the possibility of ethically terminating an infant's life postnatally.
  • Considers this postnatal termination as a potential alternative to third-trimester feticide, under specific parental requests and ethical frameworks.

Impact:

  • Provides ethical guidance for complex neonatal end-of-life decisions.
  • Informs medical professionals and ethicists on navigating life-and-death situations in neonatal care.
  • Contributes to the bioethical discourse on the value of life and quality of life in neonates.