Related Experiment Videos
A data-based agenda for doctoral nursing education reform.
Ann F Minnick1, Lois A Halstead
1College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Nursing Outlook
|April 26, 2002
Summary
Doctoral nursing programs show varied degree titles and inconsistent requirements, threatening program quality. Leadership consensus and action are crucial for advancing nursing education standards.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Education
- Higher Education Policy
Background:
- Concerns exist regarding the diversity of degree nomenclature and the quality of doctoral nursing programs.
- Nursing leadership must address current educational realities through consensus-driven strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the current status of doctoral nursing education in the US.
- To identify necessary leadership initiatives for program definition, scope, and resource allocation.
Main Methods:
- A mailed survey with a 63.4% response rate was employed.
- A comprehensive review of all US doctoral nursing program websites was conducted.
- Data were collected on 87 doctoral nursing programs, including degree specifics and institutional factors.
Main Results:
- The Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) was the predominant degree title (71 programs).
- Degree titles lacked consistent correlation with program requirements (e.g., dissertations, practica) or stated objectives.
- Faculty rank and research experience indicated potential fiscal and educational risks to program integrity in numerous institutions.
Conclusions:
- While individual institutions should enhance educational quality, a unified approach across all doctoral programs is essential.
- Five actionable recommendations are proposed to address identified challenges in doctoral nursing education.