Related Experiment Videos
The malleability of anchoring effects
1University of Würzburg, Germany. mussweiler@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
Experimental Psychology
|April 27, 2002
Summary
Anchoring effects, where estimates assimilate to a standard, are malleable. Focusing on similarities amplifies anchoring assimilation, challenging its perceived robustness.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Anchoring effects are typically robust, influencing numeric estimates via assimilation to a standard.
- Existing models suggest anchoring involves hypothesis testing, implying potential malleability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the malleability of anchoring effects by manipulating the focus on similarities versus differences.
- To determine if altering the hypothesis-testing process influences the magnitude of anchoring.
Main Methods:
- A procedural priming task was used to induce a focus on similarities or differences.
- Participants completed a series of anchoring tasks after the priming manipulation.
Main Results:
- The magnitude of the anchoring effect was significantly influenced by the similarity/difference focus.
- A stronger anchoring assimilation effect was observed when participants focused on similarities compared to differences.
Conclusions:
- Anchoring effects are not as robust as previously assumed and can be modulated by cognitive focus.
- Findings suggest that the nature of the hypothesis-testing process is crucial in determining the strength of anchoring.