Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer-enhanced vs. standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

W Scott Melvin1, Bradley J Needleman, Kevin R Krause

  • 1Department of Surgery and the Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Ohio State University School of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. melvin14@osu.edu

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery : Official Journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
|May 3, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tunable self-assembling cellular microarray for single-neutrophil vital and suicidal extracellular traps.

Lab on a chip·2026
Same author

Diversity in operative coaching: exploring gender and race differences in evaluations.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Bidirectional regulation of liver sinusoidal clearance by amino acid nanofibers and IGFBP4 complex: effects on HbA1c.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2025
Same author

Multiparametric Bulk and Single Extracellular Vesicle Pipeline for Identifying Adipose-Specific Signatures in Matched Human Biospecimens.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Lessons for the surgeon from the early history of the Zollinger Ellison syndrome: The 6th Alexander Walt Historical Lecture Presented at the Midwest Surgical Association 68th Annual Meeting Delavan, Wisconsin July 27, 2025.

American journal of surgery·2025
Same author

Cutting through the p-value: evaluating clinical relevance in surgical literature analyzing the approaches for inguinal hernia repair.

Surgical endoscopy·2025

Robotic antireflux surgery is safe but takes longer than standard laparoscopic surgery. While outcomes are similar, fewer patients required medication after robotic procedures, suggesting potential long-term benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Technology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Computer-assisted telesurgical devices are increasingly approved for general surgery.
  • Robotic surgery offers advanced visualization and control for complex procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of computer-enhanced robotic fundoplication with standard laparoscopic fundoplication.
  • To evaluate operative times, complications, patient symptoms, and medication use.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective trial comparing robotic fundoplication to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
  • 40 consecutive patients were enrolled, with 20 in each group.
  • Data collected included operative times, complications, hospital stay, and postoperative symptom questionnaires.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Operative times were significantly longer in the robotic group (141 minutes) compared to the laparoscopic group (97 minutes).
  • No complications were reported in either group, and most patients were discharged on the first postoperative day.
  • At follow-up, symptom profiles were similar, but significantly fewer patients in the robotic group required antisecretory medication.

Conclusions:

  • Computer-assisted robotic antireflux surgery is a safe procedure.
  • Current robotic technology offers little advantage over standard laparoscopic approaches in terms of operative time and immediate outcomes.
  • Robotic surgery may offer potential long-term benefits, indicated by reduced medication use, warranting further investigation.